Presented at the Popular Cultural Association/National Cultural Association National Conference in Boston, Massachusetts, April 12, 2012
One of the more fascinating aspects of performing as part of the cast of a renaissance festival, particularly one in which royal court story lines get performed on a regular basis, such as at my home festival, the Maryland Renaissance Festival, is the challenge to develop information when portraying an actual historical person. It is easier to find information if you portraying a prominent person, such as King Henry VIII or his wives. However, if you are given the role of a courtier or a courtier's wife it is much more difficult to find contemporary information. Birth dates are largely unknown in the first half of the sixteenth century. Unless you are of royal birth your early life and rudimentary education will not be recorded. There may be brief glimpses of you in the historical record, but for women of the sixteenth century, unless you came to prominence on your own accord, there is little to go on for an actor to develop insight into the personality of the historical figure.
My own actor’s journey into the court of King Henry VIII began in the year 1529, better known as 2001, the 25th anniversary season of the Maryland Renaissance Festival. Prior to this season I had portrayed fictional village characters. I was ready for a change and was assigned Gertrude Blount Courtenay, the Marchioness of Exeter. My first reaction to this was, “who?” My second reaction was how on earth do I pronounce Marchioness.
We are extremely lucky at the Maryland Renaissance Festival to have a resident historian who is also the court director, Mary Ann Jung. There are also several other members of the cast who either have years of experience in historical interpretation or, like myself, are amateur Tudor history geeks. At the first rehearsal I was given a basic fact sheet on the Marchioness.
Titles: Marchioness of Exeter (1525)
Father: William Blount, 4th Baron Mountjoy (1479-1534) Catherine of Aragon’s chamberlain.
Mother: Elizabeth Say.
Husband: Henry Courtenay (1496 – x1538) Marquis of Exeter, a grandson of Edward IV.
Children: Edward Courtenay, Earl of Devon (1526-1556).
v Devout Catholic
v Somewhat of an enigma, being called both a “pathetic, ailing, devout, rather silly woman, with the credulous faith of the women of her kind” and an “energetic, high-spirited woman” willing to risk her life to keep a Catholic on the throne.
v Participated in pageantry at court.
v Accompanied Princess Mary at a May 1527 banquet for the French ambassador.
v Ensured that Queen Catherine’s staff were musically well-equipped.
v Very resourceful.
v Became a “useful, imperturbable go-between” for Princess Mary and Chapuys.
v At the same time she was working for Princess Mary, she was one of the Godmothers to Princess Elizabeth.
v She eventually consulted the Nun of Kent on a “family matter”, but apologized to Henry VIII and was pardoned for her indiscretion.
v Worked behind the scenes to bring down Anne Boleyn.
v Told Chapuys in January 1536 of Anne Boleyn’s witchery.
v Bore Prince Edward to the font at his Christening.
v Served water to King Henry and Queen Jane.
v She was eventually attainted and sentenced to death for treason in 1539, but she was pardoned in 1540.
v Her husband was not so fortunate: he was executed in 1538.
v She remained a loyal friend to Princess Mary and became part of her court when she rose to the throne.
From this fact sheet this woman clearly intrigued me. Obviously, the Marchioness of Exeter was a prominent figure at the court of King Henry VIII and Queen Mary I. Why had I not heard of her or her husband before? I knew her son’s name Edward Courtenay, Earl of Devon from his role in the Wyatt Rebellion of 1554. That was as little as I knew. I had been obsessed with the court of King Henry VIII since I was ten years old and watched the BBC miniseries The Six Wives of Henry VIII that was broadcast on CBS and PBS in 1971. Yet, I had never come across the Exeters in my reading, or if I did, they did not register as important.
As an actor at the Maryland Renaissance Festival we are encouraged to continue our research into the people we are portraying. It helps us give a richer performance and our discoveries can help to write our character’s roles in the scripted storylines that are performed at the Festival. What has differed for me is that I have developed a decade long love for the Marchioness of Exeter that has steered me into discovering as much about her as I can. Thanks to resources that were not available to me a decade ago when I first portrayed the Marchioness, I have gained a deeper understanding of this complex and important woman who served at the court of King Henry VIII.
In 2001 I had more limited options and they involved rudimentary research on the Internet, going to the library and ordering used books. The first resource that I consider essential when researching a woman from the English court in the 16th century is Burke’s Peerage in its various forms and volumes. This will give you basic genealogy for both the father’s family and the husband’s family by searching under either the family name or the title and these sources will give you a basic biography that include the titles and offices that the father or husband held at the court. There are also websites such as www.tudorplace.com.ar and www.tudorhistory.org that provide short biographies of the important figures of Tudor history using some of the same material.
Here is what I learned about the Marchioness’ father, William Blount, 4th Baron Mountjoy. William Blount was the son and heir of John, 3rd Baron Mountjoy who succeeded to the title on the death of his father in 1485 while still a child. He studied in Paris where he met and became the patron of the famous humanist scholar, Erasmus. Lord Mountjoy paid Erasmus a pension of 100 crowns per year. There are several Latin letters between Erasmus and Mountjoy and Erasmus dedicated several of his writings to Lord Mountjoy and his son, Charles.
From Erasmus’ letters we know that Lord Mountjoy came back to England around 1497/1498, probably because William’s marriage had been arranged to Elizabeth Saye, the daughter of Sir William Saye. Lord Mountjoy would marry multiple times, and his other wives included Alice Kebel, the widow of William Browne, Lord Mayor of London, and Dorothy Grey, daughter of Thomas, Marquis of Dorset. Antonia Fraser in her The Wives of Henry VIII states that Lord Mountjoy also married Katherine of Aragon’s Spanish lady-in-waiting, Inez de Venegas and that Inez was Gertrude’s mother thus making Gertrude half-Spanish. Sources differ on whether Inez was his second or his fourth wife. In order for Inez to be Gertrude’s mother Gertrude would have to have been born during Henry VIII’s reign after 1509 and given that her marriage occurred in 1519 and she starts to make appearances at court shortly after that, it is unlikely. I have come to the conclusion that Gertrude is most likely the child of his first marriage to Elizabeth Saye.
It was Lord Mountjoy’s court career that made it possible for Gertrude to make her illustrious marriage to the King’s first cousin, Henry Courtenay. Lord Mountjoy is present at many of the prominent events of the first two decades of the reign of King Henry VIII. In 1512 he becomes Chamberlain to Queen Katherine of Aragon, a position he remained in with a few gaps until the fall of 1533, when he was tasked with informing the “Princess Dowager” that her marriage was invalid. He died the following year.
Gertrude is believed to be Lord Mountjoy’s eldest child.  He would have several more children by his many wives, Mary, Charles, Katherine, John, Dorothy and another Mary. As to her birth year it is listed in sources as anywhere from 1499 to 1504 and in some sources as late as 1509. As is typical for a female courtier of the early 16th century Gertrude does not merit a mention in her own right until she is married.
There is slightly more information about Gertrude’s husband, Henry Courtenay, although his importance at the court of Henry VIII has been diminished in popular culture in favor of those courtiers who have closer ties to the families of the king’s subsequent wives. One of the best sources I found during the early years of my research came unexpectedly. Horatia Durant published a book on the three generations of the Earls of Devonshire in 1960. Entitled Sorrowful Captives: The Tudor Earls of Devon, Ms. Durant gained access to the family archives of the current Earls of Devon who live in Powderham Castle.
Henry is the only surviving child of William Courtenay and Princess Katherine Plantagenet. William was the son of Edward, created 1st Earl of Devonshire in 1485 for loyal service to King Henry VII. William married the Queen’s younger sister in 1495. When Queen Elizabeth of York dies, it is Princess Katherine who acts as chief mourner at her funeral. Unfortunately William begins a pattern in which his family is suspected of treason for supporting the Yorkist claimants to the throne. William is arrested in 1502 and attainted for corresponding with Edmund de la Pole, Earl of Suffolk. He would be released from the Tower on the ascension of King Henry VIII and he was given the honor of carrying the Third Sword at the coronation. The attainder is reversed and William is granted his father’s title of Earl of Devonshire in 1511, but he dies before the formalities are completed. Henry Courtenay appears to have been close to his cousin Henry VIII. He succeeds to the Earldom on his father’s death, participates in the invasion of France in 1513 and by 1520 becomes a privy councilor and a gentleman of the privy chamber. 
Now it is time for Gertrude to step forward into history. She was Henry Courtenay’s second wife. He was first married to Elizabeth Grey, Viscountess Lisle in her own right, but she died young no later than early 1519. Ms. Durant uncovers evidence that Gertrude and Henry’s marriage almost did not happen. In 1519 Henry Courtenay was proposed as a husband for the niece of William of Chievres, Charles V, the Holy Roman Emperor’s chamberlain and tutor. As Horatia Durant quotes in her book, Sir Thomas More wrote to Cardinal Wolsey,
“as touching the overture made by my Lord of Shevers for the marriage of my Lord of Devonshire, the King is well content, and as me seemeth, very glad of the motion, wherein he requireth Your Grace that it may like you to call my Lord of Devonshire to your Grace, and to advise him secretly to forbear any further treaty of marriage with my Lord of Mountjoy for a while; staying the matter, not casting it off; shewing him that there is a far better offer made him, of which the King would that he should not know the speciality before he speak with his Grace.”
The marriage between Henry and Gertrude took place on October 25, 1519. The king paid 200 pounds 4 shillings and 9 pence for jousts at Greenwich to celebrate their wedding.  Gertrude makes her first appearance as Countess of Devonshire at the Field of the Cloth of Gold in 1520, where she was allowed in her retinue three women, four men servants and eight horses, and she participated as one of the virtuous ladies in the court masque, the Chateau Vert in March 1522, alongside the King’s sister, Mary, Dowager Queen of France, Mary Boleyn Carey and Anne Boleyn. Gertrude portrayed Honor. Clearly, the Marchioness had the courtly graces of music and dancing, so based on this information I could portray her as a young woman who enjoyed court entertainments during the 2001 season of the Maryland Renaissance Festival. While the year was 1529, the height of the King’s Great Matter, because it was the 25th anniversary season, it was decided to have one last “happy’ day with King Henry and Queen Katherine enjoying the hospitality of the little village of Revel Grove.
Yet, I was still intrigued by the descriptions of Gertrude that seemed so diametrically opposed. Where did they come from? For that I turned to another valuable resource for anyone researching Tudor women. In 2001, this resource was in book form, Wives and Daughters: The Women of the Sixteenth Century by Kathy Lynn Emerson. It is now available as an online resource at kateemersonhistoricals.com that has made it easier for Ms. Emerson to update her information as new scholarship has happened over the past decade. So, let’s examine Gertrude. It was from Ms. Emerson’s book that I discovered the origin of the pathetic, ailing devout portrayal was A.L. Rowse, who wrote his works on Tudor history during the period of the 1930’s – 1970’s. The source of the energetic quote is Garrett Mattingly who wrote his biography of Katherine of Aragon in 1941. Horatia Durant in 1960 clearly did not like the Marchioness saying that she wrote “interminable letters” and that she “wanted power at a time when women…seldom wielded it.”
During the off-season, I started researching more deeply into Gertrude’s life. I would find snippets of her here and there, references to her in letters that placed her even more closely into the events of King Henry VIII’s reign. I discovered that it was very likely that she was, as she is portrayed in the one time she appears on the screen, in the BBC’s The Six Wives of Henry VIII, the enemy of Queen Anne Boleyn, the friend of the King’s eldest daughter Princess Mary and the woman who had the privilege of carrying Prince Edward during his christening.
In 2002, the Maryland Renaissance Festival portrayed the year 1533 and the coronation of Anne Boleyn. I figured that since the Marchioness of Exeter was a close friend of Queen Katherine that I would not be asked to portray her that season. I was wrong. As a matter of fact, when I mentioned to my Artistic Director, Carolyn Spedden that I believed based on my research that the Marchioness did not attend the coronation of Queen Anne, she wrote it into the storyline and I received a brief dramatic scene following the coronation in which Queen Anne berated my arrogance and I chose to silently take the queen’s wrath. That led to some wonderful acting opportunities for the next two seasons as the rise and fall of Anne Boleyn took place at the Festival.
Here are a few highlights of the wonderful events of Gertrude Blount, the Marchioness of Exeter’s life.
Henry Courtenay benefited from the execution of the Duke of Buckingham in 1521. He became a knight of the garter replacing the attainted Duke. In 1527 he was appointed lieutenant of the order of the Garter. He received the lordship of Caliland in Cornwall and the Duke’s London home, Red Rose in St Lawrence Pountney. He was an accomplished jouster and the records from the Field of the Cloth of Gold show that his opponent was another royal cousin, Henry, Lord Montague the eldest son of Margaret Pole, Countess of Salisbury and elder brother of the Reginald Pole who became Queen Mary I’s Archbishop of Canterbury. Henry Courtenay was created Marquis of Exeter in June 1525 on the same day that the king’s bastard son, Henry Fitzroy was created Earl of Nottingham and Duke of Richmond and Somerset. 
The Marchioness of Exeter was chosen to hold Princess Mary’s hand as she entered for a banquet in May 1527 when she was presented to the French ambassadors who proposed a French marriage for the young princess. During the Sweating Sickness epidemic of 1528 during which Mary Boleyn’s husband died and Anne and George Boleyn took ill, there is a letter from Thomas Heneage to Cardinal Wolsey that shows that the Marchioness of Exeter also took ill and that the court left her behind fleeing to Ampthill.
For the Exeters’ role in the dramatic events of the 1530’s it became necessary to dig deeper into even older source material. The Marquis performed his duty to his King and supported him in his quest for an annulment from Queen Katherine.  Both of the Exeters took part in the christening of Princess Elizabeth with Gertrude acting as godmother at the confirmation ceremony that took place immediately following the baptism. And we see in an episode from the reign of Queen Anne Boleyn, a time when Gertrude had to beg her forgiveness of the King.
There is a letter in volume two of Letters of Royal and Illustrious Ladies of Great Britain, edited by Mary Anne Everett Wood, in which a lady of the court begs the king’s forgiveness for seeking advice from Elizabeth Barton, the Holy Maid of Kent.  Sister Elizabeth Barton was famous for her predictions and she would ultimately lose her life for foolishly predicting that King Henry VIII would die if he married Anne Boleyn. Clearly if a lady of the court was caught patronizing Sister Elizabeth it could have dire consequences. What is puzzling to me is why is it presumed to be Gertrude that wrote the letter? The letter published was not taken from the original letter and it is unsigned. It comes from the Cotton Manuscripts, which were heavily damaged in a fire, and the original may be lost. Everett Wood states that the only women of rank that consulted the Holy Maid of Kent were Lady Exeter and Margaret Pole, Countess of Salisbury. She attributes the letter to Lady Exeter because of the references to her husband and by giving as a reason for the consultation that she was pregnant and had lost all of her children. Margaret Pole was a widow in her sixties at the time the letter was written. However, Everett Wood gets some information incorrect, such as stating that the Marchioness was imprisoned until the reign of Queen Mary I. She also states that the Marchioness attended Queen Anne's coronation, while other sources say she did not. Yet another reason to wish I had access to the actual material.
I do not have access to the complete letters of Eustace Chapuys, the Imperial Ambassador, but other biographers have used those letters to show that Chapuys relied on one or the other of the Exeters for a lot of the information that he passed on to his master, Charles V, Holy Roman Emperor. It is from Chapuys that we learn that the Exeters are presumed to be the sources for the King claiming that Anne Boleyn had bewitched him and the charming episode of Mistress Jane Seymour on her knees demurely rejecting a gift of sovereigns from the King begging him to respect her honor. .”
Gertrude was tireless in her role as informer to Ambassador Chapuys. It is clear from his letters that the Marchioness believed Queen Katherine and Princess Mary are in mortal danger. In two letters from Chapuys to Charles V in November 1535 he writes “The Marchioness of Exeter has sent to inform me that the King has lately said to some of his most confidential councilors that he would not longer remain in the trouble, fear and suspense he had so long endured on account of the Queen and the Princess, and that they should see at the coming Parliament, to get him released there from, swearing most obstinately that he would wait no longer. The Marchioness declares that this is as true as the Gospel, and begs me to inform your Majesty and pray you to have pity on the ladies. In the second letter he wrote, “The Personage who informed me of what I wrote to your Majesty on the 6th about the Queen and the Princess –came yesterday to this city in disguise to confirm what she had sent to me to say, and conjure me to warn your Majesty, and beg you most urgently to see a remedy. She added that the King, seeing some of those to whom he used this language shed tears, said that tears and wry faces were of no avail, because even if he lost his crown he would not forbear to carry his purpose into effect.”
I was able to portray the Marchioness of Exeter through the year 1537 participating in the fall of Anne Boleyn, the betrothal of Jane Seymour and the restoration to the court of Princess Mary. Yet, because this is a Renaissance Festival and the Exeter Conspiracy is not one of the tales that gets told in a couple of thirty minute shows I was unable to portray the downfall of the Exeters. It is a sad story that, believe it or not was portrayed by Showtime’s The Tudors series, without the Exeters taking part.
Following the death of Queen Anne Boleyn, the Marquis again did his duty in helping to suppress the Pilgrimage of Grace and a similar uprising in the west counties. He benefited greatly from the dissolution of the monasteries and became the largest landowner in the west.  Yet, it was his royal blood, his close friendship to the Pole family and his dislike of Thomas Cromwell that would prove the destruction of his family.
Margaret Pole, Countess of Salisbury, was the daughter of George, Duke of Clarence, brother of Edward IV. Her middle son, Reginald Pole, had been educated on the continent at the expense of King Henry VIII. Reginald became very vocal about opposing the divorce from Catherine of Aragon and the dissolution writing a treatise against the English Reformation entitled Pro Unitatis Ecclesiasticae Unitatis Defensione (A Defense of the Church’s Unity) better known as De Unitate.  The Marquis was close friends with the Pole family, particularly Henry Pole, Lord Montague, Margaret Pole’s eldest son. Thomas Cromwell had Geoffrey Pole, the Countess’ youngest son arrested for clandestine correspondence with his brother Reginald in August 1538 and put in solitary confinement in the Tower of London for two months. He betrayed his entire family and the Exeters.
The Marquis and Henry Pole, Lord Montague, were arrested in November 1538. The Marquis was accused of encouraging apprentices in Cornwall to march carrying his banner and declaring that he should be heir to the throne. This makes no sense, as he would not have displaced Prince Edward or Princess Mary to whom he was one of her staunchest champions. It didn’t help the Marquis that was overhead saying “Knaves rule about the King; I trust to give them a buffet one day.”
The Marchioness and their 12-year-old son, Edward was arrested along with Lady Montague and her young son, Henry Pole. The Marquis and Lord Montague were convicted of treason and executed on January 9, 1539. The Marquis was formally degraded from the Order of the Garter.  Among the other men executed in the “Exeter Conspiracy” were Sir Edward Neville and Sir Nicholas Carew whose sole crime was to have treasonous correspondence with the Marchioness.
Act of Attainder convicted the Marchioness along with several other prisoners in May 1539. For a time her cell mate in the Tower was Margaret Pole. The Marchioness is mentioned in the reports of Thomas Cromwell. In reference to being unsatisfied with her confession he wrote that “I shall try to the uttermost and never cease till the bottom of her stomach may be clearly opened and disclosed, and I can declare it to your highness by mouth more than I could by writing.” Thomas Philips, a senior warder would write “The Lady Marchioness feareth sore lest she stand in the King’s displeasure and consequently wants your Lordship’s favour. She also wanteth rainment and hath no change but only what your Lordship commanded to be provided. Further, her gentlewoman, Mistress Constance, hath no change and what she hath is sore worn. Another gentlewoman hath been with her one whole year and more and very sorry is she that she hath not to recompense them, at least their wages.” Later Cromwell’s memorandum lists “remember the Marchioness of Exeter…remember the two children in the Tower.”
The Marchioness of Exeter was pardoned on December 21, 1539 and released.  Not so her young son, who would remain a prisoner of the Tower until Queen Mary I came to the throne. Mary would restore him to his father’s family title of Earl of Devon. Young Henry Pole simply disappears from the Tower records around 1543. Margaret Pole would be executed at the age of 68 in May 1541. Geoffrey Pole attempted suicide twice, was released and lived out his life shunned by his surviving relatives.
Gertrude returned to court with the ascension of Mary and became chief gentlewoman of the queen’s bedchamber.  Her son would become the English candidate for the queen’s hand in marriage supported by Stephen Gardiner, Bishop of Winchester, whom Edward had befriended during his imprisonment.  When the Queen announced her intention to marry Philip of Spain, Edward was caught up in the Wyatt Rebellion that proposed to marry Edward to Princess Elizabeth and place them on the throne. Edward when questioned stated that while he was aware of the plans to marry him to Princess Elizabeth he had declined. He was briefly re-imprisoned in the Tower and then exiled to the continent where he traveled to Calais, Antwerp and Italy. Edward Courtenay, the last Tudor Earl of Devonshire would die in mysterious circumstances in Padua on September 18, 1556 and was buried in St. Anthony’s church. 
His mother would be forgiven by Queen Mary for her son’s mistakes and would remain a part of the Queen’s household. Gertrude Blount Courtenay, Marchioness of Exeter died on September 25, 1558 and is buried in Wimborne Minster. 
I end with Gertrude’s own words. The Marchioness of Exeter wrote several letters to her son in his exile. Five are reprinted in volume three of Letters of Royal and Illustrious Ladies of Great Britain. This letter is poignant. It is the letter of a mother desperately missing her only child.
Your letter wrote to me, dated the two-and-twentieth of October, I received from Brown the 7th of November. The letter was one way comfortable, to perceive you do not forget your mother, who esteems you above her own life. And very glad I am to hear the king’s majesty is so much your good lord as you write; beseeching our Lord long to preserve him: but sorry I am you will, as I perceive by your letter, travel so far hence, but I trust, according to your bounden duty, you will first come into England to see the queen’s highness and your poor mother, who has as little worldly comfort as ever woman had, saving only the goodness and comfort of the queen’s highness. As I perceive by your letter, your man has to say to me from you, but, as he writes to me, he trusts you shall shortly come hither and speak with me yourself; the which I would be most gladdest of, and causes me purposely send this bearer to bring me word; if there be any such good news I will remain here till I hear the certainty what you will do. And thus with my hearty blessing I will bid you farewell, for I am at this present so pained with the cholic and the stone, that I have much ado to write; fearing you cannot read this ill written letter, praying daily for your short return into England. Written the 8th of November, from Master Warham’s house at Malsanger.
If you come to England I trust I shall see you, or else I will shortly write to you if I be alive.
By your most assured loving mother,
Dodds, Madeleine Hope and Ruth. The Pilgrimage of Grace 1536-1537 and The Exeter Conspiracy 1538, volume one. London: Frank Cass and Company Ltd. 1915, 1971.
Durant, Horatia. Sorrowful Captives: The Tudor Earls of Devon. Great Britain: Pontypool, Hughes & Son, Ltd. The Griffin Press. 1960.
Emerson, Kathy Lynn. Wives and Daughters: The Women of the Sixteenth Century. Albany, New York: Whitston Publishing Company, Inc. 1984, 2001.
Everett Wood, Mary Anne. Letters of Royal and Illustrious Ladies of Great Britain, three volumes. London: Henry Colburn. 1846.
Fraser, Antonia. The Wives of Henry VIII. New York: Alfred A. Knopf. 1992
Ives, Eric. The Life and Death of Anne Boleyn. Malden: Massachusetts: Blackwell Publishing. 2004.
Jerdan, William. The Rutland Papers. New York and London: AMS Press. 1968.
Matthew, David. The Courtiers of Henry VIII. London: Eyre & Spottiswoode. 1970.
Murphy, Beverley A. Bastard Prince: Henry VIII’s Lost Son. Stroud, Gloucestershire: Sutton Publishing Ltd. 2001.
Naylor Okerlund, Arlene. Queenship and Power: Elizabeth of York. New York: Palgrave MacMillan. 2009.
Seward, Desmond. The Last White Rose: Dynasty, Rebellion and Treason The Secret Wars Against The Tudors. London: Constable & Robinson Ltd. 2010.
Starkey, David. Six Wives: The Queens of Henry VIII. London: Chatto & Windus. 2003.
St. Clare Byrne, Muriel Ed. The Letters of King Henry VIII. New York: Funk & Wagnalls. 1936, 1968.
Taylor, Jr., James D. The Shadow of the White Rose: Edward Courtenay, Earl of Devon 1526-1556. New York: Algora Publishing. 2006.
Towend, Peter, editor. Burke's Genealogical and Heraldic History of the Landed Gentry, 18th edition, 3 volumes. London, England: Burke's Peerage Ltd, 1965-1972
Tremlett, Giles. Catherine of Aragon: Henry’s Spanish Queen. London: Faber and Faber Ltd. 2010.
 Dictionary of National Biography, pg. 721
 Antonia Fraser, The Wives of Henry VIII (New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 1992) 195
 Tremlett, Giles, Catherine of Aragon: Henry’s Spanish Queen (London: Faber and Faber Limited, 2010) 378-379
 Charles Mosley, editor, Burke's Peerage, Baronetage & Knightage, 107th edition, 3 volumes (Wilmington, Delaware, U.S.A.: Burke's Peerage (Genealogical Books) Ltd, 2003), volume 1, page 1123.
 Arlene Naylor Okerlund, Queenship and Power: Elizabeth of York (New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2009) 127
 Okerlund 204
 Horatia Durant. Sorrowful Captives: The Tudor Earls of Devon (Pontypool, Hughes & Son, Ltd. The Griffin Press, 1960) 26
 Durant 28
 Dictionary of National Biography, pg. 1261.
 Durant, pg.36.
 William Jerdan, F.S.A. M.R.S.L.The Rutland Papers (New York and London: AMS Press, 1968) 36
 Eric Ives, The Life and Death of Anne Boleyn (Malden, Massachusetts: Blackwell Publishing, Ltd. 2004) 37
 Durant 36
 Durant 37
 Durant 52
 Dictionary of National Biography, pg. 1261.
 Durant 37.
 Beverley A. Murphy, Bastard Prince: Henry VIII’s Lost Son (Gloucestershire: Sutton Publishing Limited, 2003) 55
 Durant 40
M. St. Clare Byrne, Ed. The Letters of King Henry VIII (New York: Funk and Wagnalls, 1968) 72
 David Matthew, The Courtiers of Henry VIII (London: Eyre & Spottiswoode, 1970) 147
 Mary Anne Everett Wood, Letters of Royal and Illustrious Ladies of Great Britain, Volume Two (London: Henry Colburn, 1846) 96-101
 Durant 45
 David Starkey, Six Wives: The Queens of Henry VIII (London: Chatto & Windus, 2003) 551
 Madeleine Hope Dodds and Ruth Dodds, The Pilgrimage of Grace 1536-1537 and The Exeter Conspiracy 1538 Volume One (London: Frank Cass & Co. Ltd. 1915, 1971) 24-25
 Durant 47
 Durant 50-52
 Desmond Seward, The Last White Rose: Dynasty, Rebellion and Treason; The Secret Wars Against The Tudors (London: Constable & Robinson, Ltd., 2010) 240
 Durant 57
 Durant 58
 Durant 61-62
 Durant 59
 Durant. 63
 Matthew 153
 Durant 64
 James D. Taylor, Jr. The Shadow of the White Rose: Edward Courtenay, Earl of Devon 1526-1556 (New York: Algora Publishing, 2006) 59
 Durant 63
 Durant 76
 Seward 316
 Taylor 75
 Taylor 85
 Taylor 160-161
 Everett Wood, Volume Three, 307-309